Stretch Concealer for Dewy Buildable Coverage Light 3 dupes and alternatives Glossier
4.2 (666)·Very fair · Olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium fair, warm-neutral undertones
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium fair, warm-neutral undertones
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: very fair, cool-neutral undertones
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: very fair, warm-neutral undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium with a peach undertone
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium-full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (64%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage
Retailer shade note: light with golden beige undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: L2.2 - light with warm undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage
Retailer shade note: very light with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage
Retailer shade note: very light with golden undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: very fair, warm-neutral undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: L2.8 - light to medium with warm undertones, and a peach tone
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium fair, warm-neutral undertones
The closest shade to Glossier Stretch Concealer for Dewy Buildable Coverage Light 3 (Very fair · Olive undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer in Café Con Leche, against Glossier Stretch Concealer for Dewy Buildable Coverage in Light 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLight 3Closest matchCafé Con LecheHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%96#fed697#fad290Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared89
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared65
Longevity30%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, combinationSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$9.01 less (41%)
View at Target
