Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (56%)4.5 (32,188)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Peach rather than red· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Peach rather than red · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Coral rather than red
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Coral rather than red · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
94
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
47
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Terracotta rather than red· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Terracotta rather than red · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than red· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than red · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Clinique Chubby Stick Cheek Color Balm Cream Blush in Ramp’d Up Rouge, against Glow Recipe Watermelon Glow Niacinamide Dewy Flush - Brightening Serum Blush in Cherry Flush. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCherry FlushClosest shade matchRamp’d Up RougeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%88#d3353a#d13442Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall78
Finish50%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation25%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format25%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 81/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Patrick Ta Major Headlines Double-Take Crème & Powder Blush Duo in She Left Me On Red, against Glow Recipe Watermelon Glow Niacinamide Dewy Flush - Brightening Serum Blush in Cherry Flush. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCherry FlushClosest overall alternativeShe Left Me On RedHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%87#d3353a#de222eVery close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared87
Finish50%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 81/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $3 more
