Glow & Care Shine Lipstick 215 Julie Blush dupes and alternatives Gucci
4.4 (817)·Rose · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Charlotte Tilbury Matte Revolution Hydrating Lipstick in Pillow Talk Medium, against Gucci Glow & Care Shine Lipstick in 215 Julie Blush. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade215 Julie BlushClosest shade matchPillow Talk MediumHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall94
Colour60%99#a3464d#a2454dLooks identicalColour difference 0.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 85/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick in Sitting Pretty, against Gucci Glow & Care Shine Lipstick in 215 Julie Blush. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade215 Julie BlushClosest overall alternativeSitting PrettyHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall93
Colour60%98#a3464d#a6474dLooks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumLightCloseDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%60WarmNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family13%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%—not comparableNot listedSatinNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Overall match 95/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $15 more
