Re-form Luminous Skin Foundation 3.25 Light/Medium - Neutral dupes and alternatives Haleys Beauty
4.3 (136)·Fair · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (38%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Light skin with golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light shade, golden undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Fair skin with peachy-golden undertones
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (36%)4.2 (812)
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: L4 - light with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Haleys Beauty Re-form Luminous Skin Foundation 3.25 Light/Medium - Neutral (Fair · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
RMS Beauty ReEvolve Natural Finish Foundation in 22, against Haleys Beauty Re-form Luminous Skin Foundation in 3.25 Light/Medium - Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3.25 Light/Medium - NeutralClosest shade match22How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#facea1#face9fLooks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100FairFairSameDepth difference: 0.0
Retailer descriptionLightNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared60
Longevity30%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall68
Skin type100%68SensitiveCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 85/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Yves Saint Laurent Skin Affair Soft Glow Cushion Foundation in LN4, against Haleys Beauty Re-form Luminous Skin Foundation in 3.25 Light/Medium - Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3.25 Light/Medium - NeutralClosest overall alternativeLN4How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#facea1#f3c89dVery close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95FairFairSameDepth difference: 3.1
Retailer descriptionLightLightBoth described as lightThe retailers describe the same depth
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0SensitiveNormalMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 87/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $10 more
