Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar contour overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Use as contour: possible
Retailer shade note: natural matte finish for fair skin tones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: contour for very light to light skin
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Bronze rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Bronze rather than brown · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Retailer shade note: light bronze with neutral undertones
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Bronze rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Bronze rather than brown · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Retailer shade note: light-medium bronze with neutral undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: for fair light – light complexions
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than brown · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Retailer shade note: very light bronze with neutral undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: natural matte finish for light to light-medium skin tones
Danessa Myricks Beauty Balm Contour in Light 1, against Haleys Beauty Re-sculpt Smoothing Matte Contour Powder in Light. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLightClosest shade matchLight 1How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour50%70#c4a27f#c7a690Close colourColour difference 4.9 (0 is identical)
Depth25%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall74
Finish60%78MatteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than matte
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, OilyNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 73/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Fenty Beauty Match Stix Contour Skinstick in Soft Amber, against Haleys Beauty Re-sculpt Smoothing Matte Contour Powder in Light. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLightClosest overall alternativeSoft AmberHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour50%87#c4a27f#c69c77Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth25%97LightLightSameDepth difference 2.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, OilyNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.