Color Fuse Longwear Hydrating Glassy Lip + Cheek Blush Balm Stick Glassy Hibiscus dupes and alternatives Haus Labs
4.3 (760)·Mauve · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy
Differences: Plum rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: A soft plum blush fused with Mood Light to brighten the complexion
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same format: cream· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
96
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: gold and cool pink, for pale skin tones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Rose rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Rose rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
53
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: raspberry, bronze and neutral pink, for medium skin tones.
Differences: Lighter· Plum rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Plum rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Rare Beauty Stay Vulnerable Melting Cream Blush in Nearly Mauve, against Haus Labs Color Fuse Longwear Hydrating Glassy Lip + Cheek Blush Balm Stick in Glassy Hibiscus. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGlassy HibiscusClosest shade matchNearly MauveHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%89#c58a90#d18d93Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall75
Finish50%67DewyNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than dewy
Pigmentation25%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Format25%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%408-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 80/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
bareMinerals GEN NUDE BLONZER Blush + Bronzer in Kiss of Mauve, against Haus Labs Color Fuse Longwear Hydrating Glassy Lip + Cheek Blush Balm Stick in Glassy Hibiscus. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGlassy HibiscusClosest overall alternativeKiss of MauveHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour55%73#c58a90#d18685Close colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$18 less (53%)
