Precision Sculpt Shaping Balm Contour Stick Profile dupes and alternatives Haus Labs
4.6 (287)·Taupe · Neutral · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar contour overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than taupe · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Dry, Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Dry, Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: natural matte finish for light to light-medium skin tones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than taupe · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than taupe · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Sensitive rather than normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than taupe · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: contour, cool undertone for light to medium skin tones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Combination rather than normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
96
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
30
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than taupe · Powder rather than stick (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Golden rather than taupe· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Golden rather than taupe · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Retailer shade note: fair to light with cool undertones
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Golden rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Golden rather than taupe · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Retailer shade note: warm golden undertone, natural finish for light skin tones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
96
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
30
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Sensitive rather than normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
e.l.f. Cosmetics Halo Glow Contour Beauty Wand in Fair/Light, against Haus Labs Precision Sculpt Shaping Balm Contour Stick in Profile. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeProfileClosest shade matchFair/LightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour50%79#ad9580#b2927fClose colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth25%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared70
Finish60%78MatteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format20%45StickLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than stick
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 75/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Cream Contour Stick in Greyscale, against Haus Labs Precision Sculpt Shaping Balm Contour Stick in Profile. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeProfileClosest overall alternativeGreyscaleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour50%74#ad9580#a58977Close colourColour difference 4.4 (0 is identical)
Depth25%86LightLightSameDepth difference 5.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared84
Finish60%78MatteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedSheerNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format20%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%30Normal, Oily, SensitiveNormal, CombinationDifferentBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.