Triclone Skin Tech Hydrating + De-puffing Concealer 53 Deep Neutral dupes and alternatives Haus Labs
3.9 (3,283)·Very deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: richest with neutral undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
67
Visibly different colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium-full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with neutral to golden undertones
$30Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (6%)4.7 (491)
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: very deep with warm undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: deepest with golden undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Olive rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Not marketed for normal/oily skin
The closest shade to Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Hydrating + De-puffing Concealer 53 Deep Neutral (Very deep · Neutral undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
NYX Professional Makeup Bare With Me Hydrating Face & Body Concealer Serum in Deep, against Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Hydrating + De-puffing Concealer in 53 Deep Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade53 Deep NeutralClosest matchDeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour60%80#503b32#583b2dClose colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Normal, dry, oilyNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 74/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $4 more
View at CVS
