Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Bisque 1.8 dupes and alternatives Hourglass
4.2 (5,208)·Fair · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$36Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (8%)4.5 (515)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium-full rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Bisque 1.8 (Fair · Neutral undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer in 1.5, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Bisque 1.8. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBisque 1.8Closest shade match1.5How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%92#edc9ab#e6c1a3Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92FairLightCloseDepth difference: 3.9
Retailer descriptionFairFairBoth described as fairThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%60FullMediumSome differenceMedium coverage rather than full
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Normal, dry, combinationNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer in 2 Fair, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Bisque 1.8. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBisque 1.8Closest overall alternative2 FairHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%89#edc9ab#f6cbadVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97FairFairSameDepth difference: 2.0
Retailer descriptionFairVery fairSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall67
Skin type100%67Normal, dry, combinationDry, normalBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 93/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (8%)
