Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Clove 11.4 dupes and alternatives Hourglass
4.2 (5,208)·Very deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Deep with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with cool brown undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for very rich, deep skin w/ neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal skin
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: rich skin tones with golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
44
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with cool undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
44
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with neutral to golden undertones
$16.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$22.01 less (56%)4.4 (832)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
77
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: D3 - Deep with neutral undertones
The closest shade to Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Clove 11.4 (Very deep · Neutral undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Kosas Revealer Super Creamy + Brightening Concealer in Tone 9.5 N, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Clove 11.4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeClove 11.4Closest shade matchTone 9.5 NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#70402b#77402bVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Overall match 81/100Shade match 95/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Too Faced Born This Way Super Coverage Multi-Use Concealer in Cocoa, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Clove 11.4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeClove 11.4Closest overall alternativeCocoaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%89#70402b#6a3c23Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared86
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Overall match 89/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$3 less (8%)
