#FauxFilter Matte Buildable Coverage Waterproof Concealer Chocolate Chip 8.7 Red dupes and alternatives Huda Beauty
4.5 (7,068)·Rich deep · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: very deep with cool undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: richest with neutral undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than cool undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than cool undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with warm, peach undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with very warm, rosy undertones
$12Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (61%)4.5 (1,593)
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: very deep with warm undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with very warm, rosy undertones
The closest shade to Huda Beauty #FauxFilter Matte Buildable Coverage Waterproof Concealer Chocolate Chip 8.7 Red (Rich deep · Cool undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Milk Makeup Future Fluid Longwear Hydrating Concealer in 30NC, against Huda Beauty #FauxFilter Matte Buildable Coverage Waterproof Concealer in Chocolate Chip 8.7 Red. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChocolate Chip 8.7 RedClosest shade match30NCHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%85#432a1e#44271fClose colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56MatteNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than matte
Coverage30%80FullBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared75
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Normal, dry, oilyNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Tarte Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer in 61N espresso neutral, against Huda Beauty #FauxFilter Matte Buildable Coverage Waterproof Concealer in Chocolate Chip 8.7 Red. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared70
Longevity30%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, oilyNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/oily skin
Overall match 83/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$19.01 less (61%)
