#FauxFilter Matte Buildable Coverage Waterproof Concealer Maple Syrup 8.2 Golden dupes and alternatives Huda Beauty
4.5 (7,068)·Very deep · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: deepest with golden undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly lighter· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Olive rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Olive rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with very warm, rosy undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly lighter· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deeper skin with neutral warm undertones
$30Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (3%)4.7 (491)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: very deep with warm undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with neutral cool undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 27% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral rich-brown undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 27% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: ultra deep with cool rich-red undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 27% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: ultra deep with neutral brown undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with very warm, rosy undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with rosy undertones
The closest shade to Huda Beauty #FauxFilter Matte Buildable Coverage Waterproof Concealer Maple Syrup 8.2 Golden (Very deep · Warm · golden undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Tarte Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer in 60H mahogany honey, against Huda Beauty #FauxFilter Matte Buildable Coverage Waterproof Concealer in Maple Syrup 8.2 Golden. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMaple Syrup 8.2 GoldenClosest match60H mahogany honeyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%88#65361d#693521Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared70
Longevity30%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, oilyNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/oily skin
Overall match 87/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$1 less (3%)
