Multi-Stick Cream Blush + Highlighter + Lip Tint In the Mood dupes and alternatives ILIA
4.3 (4,679)·Peach · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Coral rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: shimmering deep coral with gold pearl
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: soft peach (swish and pop glow)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than peach· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Coral rather than peach · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Coral rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Coral rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: warm coral with golden shimmer
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Berry rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
57
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
ILIA Soft Focus Blurring Blush - Talc-Free Powder Blush in Flutter, against ILIA Multi-Stick Cream Blush + Highlighter + Lip Tint in In the Mood. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeIn the MoodClosest shade matchFlutterHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour55%90#e88a85#e08f87Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall40
Finish50%47ShimmerNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation25%30OpaqueSheerDifferentSheer rather than opaque
Format25%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, Combination, OilyNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 73/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Hourglass Ambient Lighting Blush in Diffused Heat, against ILIA Multi-Stick Cream Blush + Highlighter + Lip Tint in In the Mood. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeIn the MoodClosest overall alternativeDiffused HeatHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour55%84#e88a85#f4817eClose colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 80/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.