Multi-Stick Cream Blush + Highlighter + Lip Tint Lady Bird dupes and alternatives ILIA
4.3 (4,679)·Rose · Neutral · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown / nude rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown / nude rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: stick· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: nude pink / light to tan with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than rose· Shimmer rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
49
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than rose · Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Mauve rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration
Anastasia Beverly Hills Magic Touch Cream Blush & Lip Trio in Pink, against ILIA Multi-Stick Cream Blush + Highlighter + Lip Tint in Lady Bird. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLady BirdClosest matchPinkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour55%97#b07574#b47676Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Combination, OilyNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$15.20 less (60%)
