Beautler.Your beauty butler

Beyond Matte Liquid Foundation M13 dupes and alternatives Jane Iredale

Tan

Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).

Only showing matches with a radiant finish.

Closest shade match: Juvia's Place I am Magic Natural Radiance Foundation 520 Tangier

The equivalent shade: scored on colour, depth and undertone only.

Your shade
Jane Iredale
M13Change shade
Depth and undertone: Tan
Finish and coverage: Matte · Full coverage
The match
Juvia's Place
520 Tangier
Depth and undertone: Tan · Neutral · neutral golden
Finish and coverage: Radiant · Medium coverage
Shade match
90out of 100
Colour
96
Depth
100
Undertone
70
Match price
$24Ulta BeautyUlta Beauty
$30 less (56%)

Your shade $54 at Ulta Beauty · product price; shade not separately priced

Closest overall alternative: MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Serum Powered Foundation NW47

The most similar foundation overall: shade match 55%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, skin suitability 5%.

Your shade
Jane Iredale
M13Change shade
Depth and undertone: Tan
Finish and coverage: Matte · Full coverage
The match
MAC Cosmetics
NW47
Depth and undertone: Tan · Neutral
Finish and coverage: Radiant · Full coverage
Overall match
77out of 100
Shade (Shade match)
88
Finish (Finish & visual result)
62
Wear (Wear & performance)
61
Skin (Skin suitability)
84
Match price
$46Ulta BeautyUlta Beauty
$8 less (15%)

Your shade $54 at Ulta Beauty · product price; shade not separately priced

Ulta BeautyView at Ulta Beauty

More matches

Show
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.

Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.

  1. Shade match 89
    $17.99Ulta BeautyUlta Beauty(product price)$36.01 less (67%)

    Matches: Near-identical swatch colourSame full coverageClaims a skin-like finish

    Differences: Radiant rather than matte finishNo blurring effect claimedContains drying alcohol

    Score details
    Shade match
    89
    Finish & visual result
    48
    Wear & performance
    80
    Skin suitability
    84

    Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · Contains drying alcohol

    Medium confidence· Digital match

    View match
  2. Shade match 88
    $28SephoraSephora$26 less (48%)

    Matches: Very close colourClaims a skin-like finishBoth claim a blurring effect

    Differences: Radiant rather than matte finishMedium rather than full coverageNot marketed for normal skin

    Score details
    Shade match
    88
    Finish & visual result
    51
    Wear & performance
    82
    Skin suitability
    60

    Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for normal skin

    Retailer shade note: caramel - brown skin with neutral undertones

    Medium confidence· Digital match

    View match
  3. Shade match 87
    $28SephoraSephora$26 less (48%)

    Matches: Very close colourClaims a skin-like finishBoth claim a blurring effect

    Differences: Radiant rather than matte finishMedium rather than full coverageNot marketed for normal skin

    Score details
    Shade match
    87
    Finish & visual result
    51
    Wear & performance
    82
    Skin suitability
    60

    Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage

    Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for normal skin

    Retailer shade note: golden caramel - brown skin with golden undertones

    Medium confidence· Digital match

    View match

Looking for a concealer in your shade?

The closest shade to Jane Iredale Beyond Matte Liquid Foundation M13 (Tan) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.

Closest concealers

  1. Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Instant Retouch Longwear Liquid Concealer

    460

    Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Instant Retouch Longwear Liquid Concealer, shade 460

    • Very close colour
    • Tan · Warm · golden undertone

    $30

  2. Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer

    Teak 9.5

    Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer, shade Teak 9.5

    • Very close colour
    • Tan · Neutral undertone

    $39

  3. Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Long-Wear Blur Concealer

    13.5 Deep

    Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Long-Wear Blur Concealer, shade 13.5 Deep

    • Very close colour
    • Tan · Neutral · neutral golden undertone

    $36

  4. bareMinerals ORIGINAL Liquid Mineral Brightening Concealer

    Dark 5C

    bareMinerals ORIGINAL Liquid Mineral Brightening Concealer, shade Dark 5C

    • Very close colour
    • Tan · Cool undertone

    $31

  5. Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place 24-Hour Concealer

    5N

    Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place 24-Hour Concealer, shade 5N

    • Very close colour
    • Tan · Neutral · neutral golden undertone

    $38

  6. Maybelline Fit Me Natural Finish Concealer

    050 Café

    Maybelline Fit Me Natural Finish Concealer, shade 050 Café

    • Very close colour
    • Tan

    $10.99

Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.

Why the closest shade match works

Juvia's Place I am Magic Natural Radiance Foundation in 520 Tangier, against Jane Iredale Beyond Matte Liquid Foundation in M13. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.

ComparedYour shadeM13Closest shade match520 TangierScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour96#bd794c#be7846Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth100TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.3
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Undertone70UnknownNeutral · neutral goldenSome differencecandidate undertone inferred
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared43
Finish12MatteRadiantDifferentRadiant finish rather than matte
Coverage80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finishnot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared80
Longevity100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistancenot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settlingnot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stabilitynot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall84
Skin type84Combination, normal, oilyCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveBoth marketed for combination/​normal/​oily skin
Overall match 76/100Shade match 90/100Low confidence· Digital match

Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.

How scoring works

If you switch

To Juvia's Place I am Magic Natural Radiance Foundation in 520 Tangier.

Same or better

  • $30 less
  • Near-identical swatch colour
  • Medium rather than full coverage
  • Both claim long-wearing

Different

  • Radiant finish instead of matte
  • No blurring effect claimed
  • Does not claim a lightweight feel
  • Fragrance is listed in the formula

Ingredients (information only, not scored)

4 shared ingredients; weighted similarity 9%. Ingredients only affect results through the filters.

AttributeYour shadeClosest shade match
BaseWater-based, high siliconeWater-based, high silicone
FragranceNot listedListed (fragrance)
Drying alcoholNot listedNot listed
SPFNot listedNot listed
OverlapBoth water-based; silicone high vs high

Why the closest overall alternative works

MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Serum Powered Foundation in NW47, against Jane Iredale Beyond Matte Liquid Foundation in M13. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.

ComparedYour shadeM13Closest overall alternativeNW47Score
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour93#bd794c#b87b54Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth100TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.0
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Undertone70UnknownNeutralSome differencefrom retailer shade descriptions
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared62
Finish12MatteRadiantDifferentRadiant finish rather than matte
Coverage100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finishnot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared61
Longevity70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stabilitynot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall84
Skin type84Combination, normal, oilyCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveBoth marketed for combination/​normal/​oily skin
Overall match 77/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match

Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.

How scoring works

If you switch

To MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Serum Powered Foundation in NW47.

Same or better

  • $8 less
  • Very close colour
  • Same full coverage
  • Both claim a blurring effect
  • Claims transfer resistance
  • Claims not settling into lines
  • Both claim a lightweight feel

Different

  • Radiant finish instead of matte

Ingredients (information only, not scored)

4 shared ingredients; weighted similarity 10%. Ingredients only affect results through the filters.

AttributeYour shadeClosest overall alternative
BaseWater-based, high siliconeWater-based, high silicone
FragranceNot listedNot listed
Drying alcoholNot listedNot listed
SPFNot listedNot listed
OverlapBoth water-based; silicone high vs high

Where to buy

Closest shade match

Juvia's Place I am Magic Natural Radiance Foundation 520 Tangier

Match price
$24Ulta BeautyUlta Beauty
$30 less (56%)

Your shade $54 at Ulta Beauty · product price; shade not separately priced

Closest overall alternative

MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Serum Powered Foundation NW47

Match price
$46Ulta BeautyUlta Beauty
$8 less (15%)

Your shade $54 at Ulta Beauty · product price; shade not separately priced

Ulta BeautyView at Ulta Beauty

How these matches are scored

31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.

Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.