PurePressed Eye Shadow Triple Honeysuckle dupes and alternatives Jane Iredale
4.5 (720)
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims comfort
Differences: 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
63
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$26.01 less (68%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than copper· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than copper · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than copper· Cream rather than powder (format)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than copper · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim hydration · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: deep brown with cool undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than copper· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than copper · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: rich dark brown with red undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Nude rather than golden· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Nude rather than golden · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Brown rather than copper· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Brown rather than copper · Cream rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than copper· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than copper · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
MAC Cosmetics Small Glitter Eyeshadow in Oh So Gilty, against Jane Iredale PurePressed Eye Shadow Triple in Honeysuckle. Compared using pan 2 of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHoneysuckleClosest shade matchOh So GiltyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#ebb18b#f1b28aLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared19
Finish65%0MatteGlitterDifferentGlitter finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 69/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear Skin Transforming Powder Bronzer in Fair, against Jane Iredale PurePressed Eye Shadow Triple in Honeysuckle. Compared using pan 3 of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHoneysuckleClosest overall alternativeFairHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%72#f6bd8e#ebc4a0Close colourColour difference 4.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared59
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 85/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$27 less (71%)
Sephora
