Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 48 Medium dupes and alternatives Jane Iredale
4.3 (618)·Tan · Olive · warm olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium deep with warm undertones
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$42.01 less (75%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
The closest shade to Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 48 Medium (Tan · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Palladio Beauty Build + Blend Foundation Stick in Warm Caramel, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 48 Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade48 MediumClosest matchWarm CaramelHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%96#af7a4f#b0774aLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98TanTanSameDepth difference: 1.0
Retailer descriptionMediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared86
Finish35%—not comparableRadiantNot listedNot comparedFinish not listed for one product
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared85
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.