Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 48 Medium dupes and alternatives Jane Iredale
4.3 (618)·Tan · Olive · warm olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium deep with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium-deep shade, golden undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: tanned caramel with golden undertone for medium to dark skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same buildable coverage
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium skin with warm undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same buildable coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium deep shade with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Dewy rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Dewy · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Dewy rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Dewy · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Dewy rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$42.01 less (75%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium shade with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same buildable coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural matte rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural matte rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium shade with neutral-to-warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim colour stability
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same buildable coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium-deep shade, golden undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$32 less (57%)4.3 (49)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium-deep with yellow undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium skin with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium-Deep with Golden Undertones
$12.59$17.99Ulta Beauty$43.41 less (78%)4.2 (8,852)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
$20.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$35.01 less (63%)4.3 (8,122)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same olive undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium deep with olive undertones
The closest shade to Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 48 Medium (Tan · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick in 16, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 48 Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade48 MediumClosest shade match16How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%96#af7a4f#b37b4cLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.9
Retailer descriptionMediumMediumBoth described as mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%80BuildableLightCloseLight coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall67
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Palladio Beauty Build + Blend Foundation Stick in Warm Caramel, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 48 Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade48 MediumClosest overall alternativeWarm CaramelHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%96#af7a4f#b0774aLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98TanTanSameDepth difference: 1.0
Retailer descriptionMediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared86
Finish35%—not comparableRadiantNot listedNot comparedFinish not listed for one product
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared85
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $4 more
