Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 20 Light dupes and alternatives Jane Iredale
4.3 (618)·Light medium · Cool · pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for light skintones with cool undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for light skintones with neutral cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair medium with cool pink undertones
$41Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (27%)4.7 (920)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$41 less (73%)3.9 (223)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: For light skin tones with a neutral undertone
$46Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (18%)4.3 (1,197)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: neutral beige with neutral undertone for light skin
$46Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (18%)4.3 (1,197)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very light beige with neutral undertone for light skin
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$42.01 less (75%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$42.01 less (75%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$42.01 less (75%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim colour stability
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$40 less (71%)4.3 (2,230)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertones
$45Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (20%)4.0 (3,494)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for light cool skin with a subtle peach hue
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$42 less (75%)3.5 (10)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same buildable coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair or light skin tones with a neutral undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Light with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Light-medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Radiant · Light-medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Light-medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Light with neutral undertones
Matches: Same buildable coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Same buildable coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Fair to Light with Cool Neutral Undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: natural beige shade with neutral undertones
The closest shade to Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 20 Light (Light medium · Cool · pink undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Clinique Even Better Clinical Serum Foundation Broad Spectrum SPF 25 in CN 18 Cream Whip, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 20 Light. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade20 LightClosest shade matchCN 18 Cream WhipHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#e1b394#e0b494Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Overall match 78/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rabanne Fresh Touch 24H Radiant Foundation in 20C, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 20 Light. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade20 LightClosest overall alternative20CHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#e1b394#dbb294Looks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Overall match 94/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.