Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 30 Light Medium dupes and alternatives Jane Iredale
4.3 (618)·Medium light · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for light medium skintones with warm golden undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for light medium skintones with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for light medium skintones with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for light medium skintones with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral undertones
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$40 less (71%)4.3 (699)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
$46Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (18%)4.3 (1,197)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: beige with neutral undertone for light skin
$46Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (18%)4.3 (1,197)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: tanned neutral beige with peach undertone for medium skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Dewy rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Dewy · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for light medium skintones with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same radiant finish
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$32 less (57%)4.3 (49)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: light medium with peach undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same buildable coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
$42Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (25%)3.4 (2,267)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light to medium skin with warm, peach undertones
$8.74$12.49Ulta Beauty$47.26 less (84%)4.1 (11,038)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light medium, neutral to cool
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 30 Light Medium (Medium light · Warm · peach undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Hourglass Veil Hydrating Skin Tint Foundation in 7, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 30 Light Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade30 Light MediumClosest match7How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#ce9d78#cd9b76Looks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 88/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.