CULTURE Duochrome Liquid Eyeshadow Ankara dupes and alternatives Juvia's Place
4.2 (105)·Green · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
No match is close enough in colour to recommend as an overall alternative (shade match under 70).
More matches
Show
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: liquid· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than green· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than green · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than green· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than green · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: an olive green with silver shimmer
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than green· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than green · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: liquid· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: an olive green with a walnut shift
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: liquid· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than green· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than green · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than green
Score details
Shade match
29
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than green · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Terracotta rather than green· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
31
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Terracotta rather than green · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than green· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than green · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: dark chocolate metallic with golden glimmer/
gold foil with lustrous Gold sparkle
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than green
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than green · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: liquid· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Bronze rather than green
Score details
Shade match
33
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Bronze rather than green · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Copper rather than green
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Copper rather than green · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: liquid· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Matte rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Clinique All About Shadow Quad Eyeshadow in On Safari, against Juvia's Place CULTURE Duochrome Liquid Eyeshadow in Ankara. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAnkaraClosest shade matchOn SafariHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall68
Colour60%51#b1934f#968a4eSlight colour differenceColour difference 7.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%81MediumMediumSome differenceDepth difference 7.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared73
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 65/100Shade match 68/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $11 more
Sephora
