Play Bento Cream Bronzer, Powder Blush & Highlighter Trio Mochamallow dupes and alternatives Kaja
4.8 (321)
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Terracotta rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Terracotta rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Claims waterproof· Both claim hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: tan to tan-deep with a warm red undertone
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Bronze rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Bronze rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Terracotta rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Terracotta rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than rose· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
96
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than rose · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (possible)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Terracotta rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Terracotta rather than rose · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Terracotta rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Terracotta rather than rose · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: for medium to deep complexions
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: cream· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than rose · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: medium to tan with a neutral golden undertone
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Terracotta rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Terracotta rather than rose · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: cream· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Bronze rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
34
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Bronze rather than rose · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
96
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: contour for medium to deep skin
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than rose· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than rose · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than rose· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than rose · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Claims waterproof· Both claim hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than rose· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than rose· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than rose · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light-medium to medium with a neutral
Too Faced Sun Bunny Blushing Bronzer in Fuchsia Bunny, against Kaja Play Bento Cream Bronzer, Powder Blush & Highlighter Trio in Mochamallow. Compared using pan 1 of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMochamallowClosest matchFuchsia BunnyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall75
Colour55%59#b95e63#bf4d4aSlight colour differenceColour difference 6.4 (0 is identical)
Depth25%92MediumMediumSameDepth difference 4.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall56
Finish50%45MatteDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than matte
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 63/100Shade match 75/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$19 less (63%)
