A Really Good Foundation 133D dupes and alternatives KimChi Chic Beauty
4.6 (558)·Deep · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
75
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same full coverage
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan to deep complexion with neutral peach undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Light rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
46
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/oily skin
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$15.01 less (52%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
99
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
92
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
92
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: for medium deep skintones with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: for medium deep skintones with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (17%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (17%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (17%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/normal skin
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (17%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural matte finish
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation 133D (Deep · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Clinique Even Better Clinical Vitamin Makeup Broad Spectrum SPF 45 Foundation in Deep Warm 2, against KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation in 133D. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade133DClosest shade matchDeep Warm 2How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%99#7a4728#7a4829Looks identicalColour difference 0.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 0.4
Retailer descriptionTanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 85/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Maybelline Super Stay Lumi-Matte Foundation in 370, against KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation in 133D. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade133DClosest overall alternative370How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#7a4728#80472aVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 1.3
Retailer descriptionTanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 88/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $15 more
