A Really Good Foundation 140D dupes and alternatives KimChi Chic Beauty
4.6 (558)·Very deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: D7 - very deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
92
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep complexion with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
92
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
75
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: D7 - Very deep with neutral undertones and an olive tone
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: D.75 - very rich deep with neutral undertones and a red tone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
46
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: D7 - very deep with neutral undertones and an olive tone
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral undertones
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (69%)4.3 (644)
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than natural matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than natural matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: richest with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same full coverage· Adds SPF 15
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural matte finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
The closest shade to KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation 140D (Very deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Refy Skin Base Hydrating Gel Skin Tint in 260N, against KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation in 140D. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade140DClosest shade match260NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#5d3c2b#5d3b2bLooks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Overall match 83/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Soft Glam Satin Foundation in 63 Rich Warm, against KimChi Chic Beauty A Really Good Foundation in 140D. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade140DClosest overall alternative63 Rich WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%92#5d3c2b#5c3726Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Overall match 87/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $26 more
