Lumilicious Lip Gloss Kiss dupes and alternatives L.A. Girl
4.8 (977)·Plum · Neutral · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip gloss overall: shade match 50%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 10%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same shine: high shine· Both claim non-sticky· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Berry rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · High shine · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Berry rather than plum · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · High shine
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky
Yves Saint Laurent Loveshine Plumping Lip Oil Gloss with Hyaluronic Acid in 08 Purple Dream, against L.A. Girl Lumilicious Lip Gloss in Kiss. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeKissClosest shade match08 Purple DreamHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall87
Colour55%87#86233d#7b2b3eVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralCoolSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100PlumPlumSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedTintedNot listed for eitherA transparency not listed for one product
Shimmer25%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists shimmer
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity100%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability10% of overall70
Non-sticky50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a non-sticky feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 81/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Bobbi Brown Crushed Oil-Infused Tinted Lip Gloss in Slow Jam, against L.A. Girl Lumilicious Lip Gloss in Kiss. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeKissClosest overall alternativeSlow JamHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall85
Colour55%74#86233d#8b2936Close colourColour difference 4.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.4 on the 0–100 scale
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a transparency
Shimmer25%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists shimmer
Wear & performance15% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Longevity100%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Comfort & suitability10% of overall70
Non-sticky50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a non-sticky feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 82/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $12.50 more
