Prism Stick Eye & Face Jelly Stick Angelic Glow dupes and alternatives L.A. Girl
4.8 (101)·Golden · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Liquid rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
L.A. Girl 4Play Eye Shadow Quad Palette in Seduce, against L.A. Girl Prism Stick Eye & Face Jelly Stick in Angelic Glow. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAngelic GlowClosest shade matchSeduceHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%95#cca284#c99d7eLooks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared23
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Overall match 68/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Jane Iredale ColorLuxe Eye Shadow Stick in Gatsby, against L.A. Girl Prism Stick Eye & Face Jelly Stick in Angelic Glow. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAngelic GlowClosest overall alternativeGatsbyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%79#cca284#d8a990Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90LightDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 4.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Overall match 90/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $6.99 more
Sephora
