Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink· 12-hour wear rather than 18-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Looks identical · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · 12-hour wear rather than 18-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (29%)4.6 (2,318)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 18-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 18-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (29%)4.8 (1,631)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than 18-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Glossy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 18-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Matte rather than cream (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Matte rather than cream (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than 18-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink· Matte rather than cream (finish)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Matte rather than cream (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 18-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than cream (finish)· 10-hour wear rather than 18-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than cream (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than 18-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Deeper· Matte rather than cream (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 18-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Matte rather than cream (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 18-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Matte rather than cream (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than 18-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Matte rather than cream (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 18-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than cream (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than 18-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than cream (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 18-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Matte rather than cream (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than 18-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Matte rather than cream (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 18-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than pink· 12-hour wear rather than 18-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than pink · 12-hour wear rather than 18-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Too Faced Cloud Crush Whipped Lip & Cheek Color in Headliner, against Lancôme L'Absolu Rouge Cream Lipstick in 391 Exotic Orchid. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade391 Exotic OrchidClosest shade matchHeadlinerHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall93
Colour60%97#b4424c#b23e49Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 78/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Stila Stay All Day Liquid Lipstick Matte in Promessa, against Lancôme L'Absolu Rouge Cream Lipstick in 391 Exotic Orchid. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade391 Exotic OrchidClosest overall alternativePromessaHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall90
Colour60%85#b4424c#c04354Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared56
Finish55%56CreamMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than cream
Opacity45%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall82
Longevity60%7018-hour wear12-hour wearSome difference12-hour wear claimed against 18-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 83/100Shade match 90/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $15 more
Target
Walgreens
