Flawless Fusion Ultra-Longwear Concealer 3.5N dupes and alternatives Laura Mercier
4.5 (402)·Medium light · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: medium with warm peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than medium-full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than medium-full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: MD2 - medium to medium-deep with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: MD1 - medium to medium-deep with warm undertones, and a golden tone
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium to tan with a peach undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium with an olive undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium-full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: medium tan with cool pink undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: medium-deep with golden undertones
$12Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (64%)4.5 (1,593)
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than medium-full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium-full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for medium to tan skin with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium-full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: medium with golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium tan with neutral olive undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: MD1 - Medium to medium-deep with warm undertones, and a golden tone
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium to tan skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than neutral undertone· Full rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: medium with golden to olive undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than medium-full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: medium tan with warm olive undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium-full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium with a peach undertone
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium with cool peachy undertones
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$20.01 less (61%)4.3 (3,814)
Matches: Very close colour
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to Laura Mercier Flawless Fusion Ultra-Longwear Concealer 3.5N (Medium light · Neutral undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
IT Cosmetics Bye Bye Under Eye Full Coverage Anti-Aging Water-Resistant Concealer in 33.5 Tan Natural, against Laura Mercier Flawless Fusion Ultra-Longwear Concealer in 3.5N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3.5NClosest shade match33.5 Tan NaturalHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#cca17f#ce9c75Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%80Medium-fullFullCloseFull coverage rather than medium-full
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared65
Longevity30%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, combination, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 82/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Beech 6, against Laura Mercier Flawless Fusion Ultra-Longwear Concealer in 3.5N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3.5NClosest overall alternativeBeech 6How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%86#cca17f#c89872Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%80Medium-fullFullCloseFull coverage rather than medium-full
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared79
Longevity30%8012-hour wear16-hour wearClose16-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, combinationSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (9%)
View at CVS