Colour Riche Intense Volume Matte Lipstick 153 Le Rosewood Ambition dupes and alternatives L'Oréal Paris
4.5 (10,199)·Plum · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the shade match: colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Ranked by the shade match: colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than plum· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than plum · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: rose petal pink with a satin finish
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than plum· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than plum · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Revlon ColorStay Overtime Lipcolor in Perennial Plum, against L'Oréal Paris Colour Riche Intense Volume Matte Lipstick in 153 Le Rosewood Ambition. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade153 Le Rosewood AmbitionClosest shade matchPerennial PlumHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall93
Colour60%89#c55e72#bb5f6cVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PlumPlumSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Finish55%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 83/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Maybelline Super Stay Teddy Tint Long Lasting Matte Lip Tint in Kneehigh, against L'Oréal Paris Colour Riche Intense Volume Matte Lipstick in 153 Le Rosewood Ambition. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade153 Le Rosewood AmbitionClosest overall alternativeKneehighHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall86
Colour60%93#c55e72#c36472Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Opacity45%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall88
Longevity60%8016-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 87/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Target
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $10.01 more
Walmart
