Infallible Cushion Foundation 365 Neutral dupes and alternatives L'Oréal Paris
4.3 (275)·Tan · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Ranked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel· Adds SPF 18
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with cool red undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: D2.5 - deep with cool undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with cool subtle red undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: extra deep with neutral brown undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with cool subtle red undertones
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with warm golden undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium-deep skin with warm/deep peachy undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium/tan skin tones with cool undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim 24-hour wear· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium deep with rosy undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with warm brown undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: D2.5 - Deep with cool undertone
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium deep with cool red undertones
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$5.99 less (30%)3.9 (4,653)
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$5.99 less (30%)3.9 (4,653)
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium tan with cool undertone
The closest shade to L'Oréal Paris Infallible Cushion Foundation 365 Neutral (Tan · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
NYX Professional Makeup Bare With Me Blur Tint Foundation in 14: Medium Tan, against L'Oréal Paris Infallible Cushion Foundation in 365 Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade365 NeutralClosest match14: Medium TanHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%79#c36748#b7653fClose colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94TanDeep tanCloseDepth difference: 3.2
Retailer descriptionNot statedMedium tanNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 83/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $32.01 more
Walmart
