Infallible Pro-Matte Foundation 114 Rich Chocolate dupes and alternatives L'Oréal Paris
4.3 (32,897)·Rich deep · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: dark or deep skin tones with an olive undertone
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Natural matte rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Natural matte rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Light rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
30
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
76
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
The closest shade to L'Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte Foundation 114 Rich Chocolate (Rich deep · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Glossier Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage in Very Deep 4, against L'Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte Foundation in 114 Rich Chocolate. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade114 Rich ChocolateClosest shade matchVery Deep 4How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%89#4d2c0a#4e2f15Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56MatteNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than matte
Coverage30%60FullMediumSome differenceMedium coverage rather than full
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared49
Longevity30%3524-hour wear12-hour wearDifferent12-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0Normal, oilySensitiveMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 69/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Foundation in 16 Neutral, against L'Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte Foundation in 114 Rich Chocolate. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade114 Rich ChocolateClosest overall alternative16 NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%83#4d2c0a#592f0bClose colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Overall match 84/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
34 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $32.10 more
Walmart
