Triple Fix Blurring and Hydrating Skin Tint Foundation Stick DG6 dupes and alternatives LYS Beauty
4.4 (504)·Deep tan · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Not marketed for combination skin
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Deep-Tan skin with a golden undertone
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (46%)3.9 (223)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/combination/oily skin
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (50%)4.1 (33)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral-olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
$20.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$7.01 less (25%)4.3 (8,122)
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same radiant finish
Differences: Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: intense deep shade, golden undertone
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: dark warm with golden undertones
$22Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (21%)3.5 (42)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to LYS Beauty Triple Fix Blurring and Hydrating Skin Tint Foundation Stick DG6 (Deep tan · Warm · golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L.A. Girl Pro.Matte Foundation in Golden Bronze, against LYS Beauty Triple Fix Blurring and Hydrating Skin Tint Foundation Stick in DG6. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDG6Closest shade matchGolden BronzeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#a8703c#a97140Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%80MediumFullCloseFull coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Dry, combination, oilyCombination, normal, oilyBoth marketed for combination/oily skin
Overall match 78/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Tarte Maracuja Juicy Glow Tint in 46S Tan-Deep Sand, against LYS Beauty Triple Fix Blurring and Hydrating Skin Tint Foundation Stick in DG6. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDG6Closest overall alternative46S Tan-Deep SandHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%90#a8703c#a97448Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep tanTanCloseDepth difference: 1.8
Retailer descriptionDeepDeep tanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 88/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $41 more
