Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation Deep 280 O dupes and alternatives m.ph by Mary Phillips
4.2 (630)·Deep · Olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: dark brown with golden undertone
The closest shade to m.ph by Mary Phillips Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation Deep 280 O (Deep · Olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Juvia's Place I am Magic Natural Radiance Foundation in 330 Accra, against m.ph by Mary Phillips Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation in Deep 280 O. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep 280 OClosest shade match330 AccraHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%94#855527#8a5528Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 0.9
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 80/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Glossier Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage in Deep 1, against m.ph by Mary Phillips Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation in Deep 280 O. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep 280 OClosest overall alternativeDeep 1How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%91#855527#7e522aVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 2.4
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared100
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared86
Longevity30%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0Normal, dry, combinationSensitiveMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 85/100Shade match 85/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.