Beautler.Your beauty butler

M·A·Cximal Silky Matte Lipstick Go Retro dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics

Brown · Warm · Deep / dark

Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.

Filters, 1 applied

Opacity

Format

Brand

Price

Preferences

Fragrance-free6Vegan0Cruelty-free0
Sort

9 of 30

Only showing matches without dimethicone.

Closest shade matchClosest overall alternative: Pat McGrath Labs MatteTrance Lipstick 1995 108

The equivalent shade and the most similar lipstick overall.

Overall match
83out of 100
Shade (Shade match)
89
Finish (Finish & visual result)
100
Wear (Wear & performance)
40
Comfort (Comfort & suitability)
70
Shade match
89out of 100
Colour
91
Depth
95
Undertone (Undertone and colour family)
80
Medium confidence· Digital matchWhy it matches
Best price
$39SephoraSephora
Costs $14 more

Your shade $25 at Sephora

More matches

Show
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.

Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.

  1. #2 · MAC Cosmetics

    M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick

    Crème In Your Coffee
    Shade match 87
    $25SephoraSephoraSame price

    Matches: Near-identical swatch colourSame opacity: opaqueBoth claim comfort

    Differences: Cool rather than warm undertoneCream rather than matte (finish)Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)

    Score details
    Shade match
    87
    Finish & visual result
    76
    Wear & performance
    70
    Comfort & suitability
    100

    Looks identical · Cream · Opaque

    Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Cream rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)

    Retailer shade note: midtone pink brown

    High confidence· Digital match

    View match
  2. #3 · MAC Cosmetics

    M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick

    Paramount
    Shade match 80
    $25SephoraSephoraSame price

    Matches: Very close colourSame opacity: opaqueBoth claim comfort

    Differences: Cool rather than warm undertoneLong-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)

    Score details
    Shade match
    80
    Finish & visual result
    88
    Wear & performance
    70
    Comfort & suitability
    100

    Very close colour · Satin · Opaque

    Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)

    Retailer shade note: reddish brown

    High confidence· Digital match

    View match
  3. Shade match 73
    $64SephoraSephoraCosts $39 more

    Matches: Same opacity: opaqueSame longevity: 12-hour wearBoth claim hydration

    Differences: Cool rather than warm undertoneNude rather than brownDoes not claim comfort

    Score details
    Shade match
    73
    Finish & visual result
    88
    Wear & performance
    100
    Comfort & suitability
    70

    Close colour · Satin · Opaque

    Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than brown · Does not claim comfort

    Retailer shade note: Deep Nude

    High confidence· Digital match

    View match
  4. #5 · Pat McGrath Labs

    SatinAllure Lipstick

    Entranced
    Shade match 86
    $30SephoraSephoraCosts $5 more

    Matches: Very close colourSame warm undertoneBoth claim comfort

    Differences: Rose rather than brownNot listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)

    Score details
    Shade match
    86
    Finish & visual result
    78
    Wear & performance
    40
    Comfort & suitability
    100

    Very close colour · Satin

    Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Rose rather than brown · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)

    Retailer shade note: warm flesh rose

    High confidence· Digital match

    View match
  5. Shade match 69
    $64SephoraSephoraCosts $39 more

    Matches: Same warm undertoneSame opacity: opaqueSame longevity: 12-hour wear

    Differences: Red rather than brownDoes not claim comfort

    Score details
    Shade match
    69
    Finish & visual result
    88
    Wear & performance
    100
    Comfort & suitability
    70

    Close colour · Satin · Opaque

    Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Red rather than brown · Does not claim comfort

    Retailer shade note: Brick Red

    High confidence· Digital match

    View match
  6. Shade match 69
    $64SephoraSephoraCosts $39 more

    Matches: Same opacity: opaqueSame longevity: 12-hour wearBoth claim hydration

    Differences: Cool rather than warm undertonePlum rather than brownDoes not claim comfort

    Score details
    Shade match
    69
    Finish & visual result
    88
    Wear & performance
    100
    Comfort & suitability
    70

    Close colour · Satin · Opaque

    Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than brown · Does not claim comfort

    Retailer shade note: Burgundy

    High confidence· Digital match

    View match
  7. #8 · MAC Cosmetics

    M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick

    Brick-O-La
    Shade match 73
    $25SephoraSephoraSame price

    Matches: Same warm undertoneSame opacity: opaqueBoth claim comfort

    Differences: Rose rather than brownLong-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)

    Score details
    Shade match
    73
    Finish & visual result
    88
    Wear & performance
    70
    Comfort & suitability
    100

    Close colour · Satin · Opaque

    Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Rose rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)

    Retailer shade note: warm dusty rose

    High confidence· Digital match

    View match
  8. #9 · MAC Cosmetics

    M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick

    Del Rio
    Shade match 73
    $25Ulta BeautyUlta BeautySame price

    Matches: Very close colourSame opacity: opaqueBoth claim comfort

    Differences: Cool rather than warm undertoneRose rather than brownLong-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)

    Score details
    Shade match
    73
    Finish & visual result
    88
    Wear & performance
    70
    Comfort & suitability
    100

    Very close colour · Satin · Opaque

    Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap

    Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)

    Retailer shade note: cool rose

    High confidence· Digital match

    View match

Why the closest match works

Pat McGrath Labs MatteTrance Lipstick in 1995 108, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Silky Matte Lipstick in Go Retro. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.

ComparedYour shadeGo RetroClosest match1995 108Score
Shade match60% of overall89
Colour91#773435#7f373bVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth95Deep / darkLightCloseDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family60BrownNudeSome differenceNeighbouring colour families
Finish & visual result20% of overall100
Finish100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Opacity100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Longevity4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistancenot comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 83/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match

Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.

How scoring works

If you switch

To Pat McGrath Labs MatteTrance Lipstick in 1995 108.

Same or better

  • Very close colour
  • Same warm undertone
  • Same finish: matte
  • Same opacity: opaque
  • Both claim comfort

Different

  • Not listed longevity instead of 12-hour wear
  • Does not claim hydration

Description, format and ingredients (information only, not scored)

Weighted ingredient similarity 6%. Ingredients only affect results through the filters.

AttributeYour shadeClosest match
Shade descriptionmuted peachy pinky brownwarm light nude
FormatBulletBullet
BaseOil-based, low siliconeOil-based, no silicone
FragranceNot listedNot listed
Drying alcoholNot listedNot listed
SPFNot listedNot listed

Where to buy 1995 108

Best price
$39SephoraSephora
Costs $14 more

Your shade $25 at Sephora

How these matches are scored

30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.

Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.