Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush Peach Twist dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (818)·Peach · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Lighter· Coral rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Coral rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Charlotte Tilbury Matte Beauty Blush Wand in Pillow Talk Peach Pop, against MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in Peach Twist. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePeach TwistClosest matchPillow Talk Peach PopHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour55%87#f4947f#f28972Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92LightLightSameDepth difference 4.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall71
Finish50%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation25%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format25%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 82/100Shade match 91/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $6 more
