Studio Fix Powder Plus Foundation NC60 dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.0 (4,686)·Deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$27.01 less (69%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$27.01 less (69%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal skin
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with cool-neutral undertones
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (59%)4.2 (561)
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: warm brown with deep depth and comfort
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Light rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Light rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal skin
Matches: Both claim 12-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim colour stability
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
40
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Light rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
39
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
$17.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$21.01 less (54%)4.2 (5,328)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than matte finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Light rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
28
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deeper skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· Adds SPF 40
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep with darker cool red undertones
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (59%)4.2 (324)
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than matte finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
50
Colour not compared · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to MAC Cosmetics Studio Fix Powder Plus Foundation NC60 (Deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Make Up For Ever HD Skin Hydra Glow Hydrating Foundation in 4N68 - Coffee, against MAC Cosmetics Studio Fix Powder Plus Foundation in NC60. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNC60Closest shade match4N68 - CoffeeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#895a46#8d5d49Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 1.9
Retailer descriptionRich deepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared54
Finish35%12MatteRadiantDifferentRadiant finish rather than matte
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared51
Longevity30%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, combination, oilyNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 78/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Juvia's Place I am Magic Powder Foundation in Tanzania - Dark 3, against MAC Cosmetics Studio Fix Powder Plus Foundation in NC60. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNC60Closest overall alternativeTanzania - Dark 3How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%90#895a46#8a553dVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 1.9
Retailer descriptionRich deepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 87/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $15 more
