Veluxe Pearl Eyeshadow All That Glitters dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,256)·Nude · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (65%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same format: powder
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: medium pink beige w/ silver micro glitter
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: taupe topper shimmer with silver flecks
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (65%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: powder
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
53
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: light champagne gold with silver sparkle
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (4%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering golden copper / a warm beige brown
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Taupe rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Taupe rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Strapless, against MAC Cosmetics Veluxe Pearl Eyeshadow in All That Glitters. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAll That GlittersClosest matchStraplessHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#b38e86#b29188Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$22 less (85%)
