Instant Age Rewind Eraser Dark Circle Treatment Concealer 149 dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.2 (11,365)·Deep · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Olive rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Olive rather than warm undertone · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral olive undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 16-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Claims long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Not marketed for sensitive skin
The closest shade to Maybelline Instant Age Rewind Eraser Dark Circle Treatment Concealer 149 (Deep · Warm undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Rare Beauty Liquid Touch Brightening Concealer in 520W, against Maybelline Instant Age Rewind Eraser Dark Circle Treatment Concealer in 149. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade149Closest match520WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%83#7e5b3a#825636Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 1.3
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared78
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%—not comparableNot listedMediumNot comparedCoverage not listed for one product
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared59
Longevity30%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0SensitiveOily, dry, combination, normalMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 77/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $23.01 more
