Super Stay Peel Off Lip Liner Ray dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.2 (1,025)·Nude · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip liner overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 10%, wear and performance 25%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than nude · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: A spicy, medium toasted-brown for versatile definition.
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than nude · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Peach rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Peach rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer
Overall match 73/100Shade match 74/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Haus Labs The Edge Long-Lasting Shaping Lip Liner in Nude Satin, against Maybelline Super Stay Peel Off Lip Liner in Ray. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRayClosest overall alternativeNude SatinHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall71
Colour60%56#f4afb5#daaaa5Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.7 (0 is identical)
Depth20%85MediumLightSome differenceDepth difference 6.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family10%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result10% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Finish100%—not comparableNot listedSatinNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Wear & performance25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared85
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Smudge and transfer30%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim smudge or transfer resistance
Overall match 74/100Shade match 71/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.