Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip gloss overall: shade match 50%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 10%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same shine: high shine· Both claim non-sticky· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · High shine · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than brown · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
$13Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (46%)3.8 (7,835)
Matches: Same shine: high shine
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim non-sticky
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · High shine · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky · Does not claim hydration
Dior Addict Lip Maximizer Plumping Gloss in 045 Shimmer Hazelnut, against MERIT Shade Slick Hydrating Tinted Lip Oil in Taupe. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTaupeClosest shade match045 Shimmer HazelnutHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall92
Colour55%98#ae4d2e#ad4a2bLooks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared78
Shine40%78High shineShimmerCloseLess shine
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a transparency
Shimmer25%—not comparableNot listedShimmerNot listed for eitherShimmer not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity100%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability10% of overall70
Non-sticky50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a non-sticky feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 79/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Hourglass Phantom Volumizing Glossy Lip Balm in Invite 80, against MERIT Shade Slick Hydrating Tinted Lip Oil in Taupe. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTaupeClosest overall alternativeInvite 80How they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall89
Colour55%92#ae4d2e#ac462aVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared78
Shine40%78High shineShimmerCloseLess shine
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a transparency
Shimmer25%—not comparableNot listedPearlNot listed for eitherShimmer not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall100
Longevity100%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Comfort & suitability10% of overall70
Non-sticky50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a non-sticky feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 86/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.