Baked Blush Ciao Bella dupes and alternatives Milani
4.6 (5,409)·Plum · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same format: powder
Differences: Berry rather than plum· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than plum · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than powder (format)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same format: powder
Differences: Berry rather than plum· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than plum · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Mauve rather than plum· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than plum · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Berry rather than plum· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than plum · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Pink rather than plum· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than plum · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Berry rather than plum· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Berry rather than plum · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Berry rather than plum· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Berry rather than plum · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims waterproof· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Berry rather than plum· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than plum · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Berry rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Berry rather than plum · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Berry rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Berry rather than plum · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Valentino Liquirosso 2 in 1 Soft Matte Liquid Lipstick & Blush in 500R - Plum It Up, against Milani Baked Blush in Ciao Bella. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCiao BellaClosest shade match500R - Plum It UpHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%87#984857#9b454fVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PlumPlumSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall53
Finish50%45DewyMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than dewy
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ILIA Soft Focus Blurring Blush - Talc-Free Powder Blush in Magnetic, against Milani Baked Blush in Ciao Bella. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCiao BellaClosest overall alternativeMagneticHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour55%83#984857#a53f55Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 84/100Shade match 84/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $17.01 more
