Baked Bronzer Amalfi Glow dupes and alternatives Milani
4.5 (917)·Bronze · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a warm bronze shade fused with Radiant Light to mimic a summer glow. (Ideal for medium/deep complexions)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Fair to light with neutral-warm undertones
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: medium neutral bronze / medium marble glow
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Medium to tan with warm undertones
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
30
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Dry rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Golden rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Golden rather than bronze · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cream rather than powder (format) · Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a medium bronze shade fused with Luminous Light for a softer, candlelit warmth. (Ideal for light/medium complexions)
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than bronze· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than bronze · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Light with neutral undertones
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warms light to light medium skin tones
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than bronze· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than bronze · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cream rather than powder (format) · Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Claims hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than bronze· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than bronze · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Use as bronzer: possible
Retailer shade note: Light tan with cool undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than bronze· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than bronze · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than bronze· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than bronze · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warms fair to light skin tones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than bronze· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than bronze · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: light-medium to medium with warm neutral undertone
Patrick Ta Major Sculpt Crème Contour & Powder Bronzer Duo in She's Statuesque, against Milani Baked Bronzer in Amalfi Glow. Matched on the bronzer pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAmalfi GlowClosest shade matchShe's StatuesqueHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour55%89#c09c83#b79a84Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth25%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 78/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
CoverGirl TruBlend Skin Enhancer Baked Luminous Bronzer in Honey Bun, against Milani Baked Bronzer in Amalfi Glow. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAmalfi GlowClosest overall alternativeHoney BunHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour55%67#c09c83#d6a48bSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.3 (0 is identical)
Depth25%84LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 6.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family5%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100DewyDewySameSame dewy finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared70
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 83/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $45.01 more
