Cheek Thrills Multi-Finish Face Trio Honeymoon Suite dupes and alternatives Morphe
4.8 (2,088)·Mauve · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Brown / nude rather than mauve· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Brown / nude rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than mauve· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 27% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Berry rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Berry rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
30
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Red rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Red rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
MERIT Flush Balm Cream Blush in Archival, against Morphe Cheek Thrills Multi-Finish Face Trio in Honeymoon Suite. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHoneymoon SuiteClosest shade matchArchivalHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%93#bf6860#bb6864Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared74
Finish50%78MatteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than matte
Pigmentation25%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Format25%—not comparableNot listedStickNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%60Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for combination, dry, normal skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ColourPop Hydrating Blush Stix in Love to See It, against Morphe Cheek Thrills Multi-Finish Face Trio in Honeymoon Suite. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHoneymoon SuiteClosest overall alternativeLove to See ItHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour55%96#bf6860#bc6762Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 82/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $23 more
