BeautyScreen Peptide Foundation Tint SPF 50 Shade 2 dupes and alternatives Naked Sundays
4.8 (950)·Light · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Buildable rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light skin with neutral tones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Medium rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Medium rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Medium rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Buildable rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light skin with neutral tones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Medium rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than light-medium coverage· Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Buildable rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Buildable rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · No SPF
The closest shade to Naked Sundays BeautyScreen Peptide Foundation Tint SPF 50 Shade 2 (Light · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
LORAC PRO Soft Focus Longwear Foundation in 03, against Naked Sundays BeautyScreen Peptide Foundation Tint SPF 50 in Shade 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeShade 2Closest shade match03How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#e5c2a7#e6c1a4Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference: 0.3
Retailer descriptionFairFairBoth described as fairThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 81/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revolution Beauty Skin Silk Serum Foundation in F6, against Naked Sundays BeautyScreen Peptide Foundation Tint SPF 50 in Shade 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeShade 2Closest overall alternativeF6How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%95#e5c2a7#e3bea0Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference: 1.9
Retailer descriptionFairLightSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 96/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.