Radiant Creamy Concealer Cannelle dupes and alternatives NARS
4.5 (22,453)·Light · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (64%)4.2 (11,365)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
57
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
83
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light to medium skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: light medium with warm undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: light medium with cool peachy undertones
$30Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (17%)4.2 (7,617)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
$16.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$19.01 less (53%)4.4 (832)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with warm peach undertones
$12Ulta Beauty(product price)$24 less (67%)4.5 (1,593)
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium skin with warm peach undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (78%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Satin rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
57
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: light medium with cool pinky undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly lighter· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: light+ with cool pink undertones
The closest shade to NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer Cannelle (Light · Warm undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer in 3.9, against NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer in Cannelle. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCannelleClosest match3.9How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%90#ecbaa5#e7b59bVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference: 2.7
Retailer descriptionLightLight mediumSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared51
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Normal, dry, combinationNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$2 less (6%)
