Radiant Creamy Concealer Dark Coffee dupes and alternatives NARS
4.5 (22,453)·Deep tan · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly cooler undertone· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly cooler undertone · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Olive rather than neutral undertone· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Olive rather than neutral undertone · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral olive undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal skin
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Olive rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: very deep with an olive undertone
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
90
Visibly different colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: deep with cool red undertones
The closest shade to NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer Dark Coffee (Deep tan · Neutral undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in CN 126 Espresso, against NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer in Dark Coffee. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDark CoffeeClosest matchCN 126 EspressoHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%80#8f7061#996f5fClose colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared81
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared51
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 77/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$14 less (39%)
View at CVS