Radiant Creamy Concealer Marron Glacé dupes and alternatives NARS
4.5 (22,453)·Fair · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (78%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Satin rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: light with warm-neutral undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (78%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Satin rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (78%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Satin rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: light with golden beige undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (64%)4.2 (11,365)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
57
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
83
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light to medium skin with warm, golden undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (78%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Satin rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: medium light with neutral undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (78%)4.2 (5,664)
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (78%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Satin rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: light with rosy peach undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
The closest shade to NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer Marron Glacé (Fair · Warm · peach undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Maybelline Instant Age Rewind Eraser Dark Circle Treatment Concealer in 120, against NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer in Marron Glacé. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMarron GlacéClosest shade match120How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%93#fdc79e#f4c59fVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97FairFairSameDepth difference: 1.9
Retailer descriptionLight mediumLightSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared82
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%—not comparableMediumNot listedNot comparedCoverage not listed for one product
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared57
Longevity30%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0Normal, dry, combinationSensitiveMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 79/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Medium Peach, against NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer in Marron Glacé. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMarron GlacéClosest overall alternativeMedium PeachHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%87#fdc79e#efbe99Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%88FairLightCloseDepth difference: 5.1
Retailer descriptionLight mediumMedium lightSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared72
Finish35%78RadiantSatinCloseSatin finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%80MediumFullCloseFull coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared65
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, dry, combinationDry, combination, normalBoth marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Overall match 82/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (78%)
Sephora
