Beautler.Your beauty butler

Radiant Creamy Concealer Walnut dupes and alternatives NARS

Medium light · Olive undertone

Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).

Only showing matches with buildable coverage, without talc or alcohol denat.

  • 1 match has no coverage listed and is not shown.

Closest shade match: Milk Makeup Future Fluid Longwear Hydrating Concealer 12O

The equivalent shade: scored on colour, depth and undertone only.

The match
Milk Makeup
12O
Depth and undertone: Medium · Olive
Finish and coverage: Natural · Buildable coverage
Shade match
78out of 100
Colour
66
Depth
87
Undertone
100
Medium confidence· Digital matchWhy it matches
Match price
$30Ulta BeautyUlta Beauty
$6 less (17%)

Your shade $36 at Sephora · product price; shade not separately priced

Closest overall alternative: bareMinerals ORIGINAL Liquid Mineral Brightening Concealer Medium Tan 3.5W

The most similar concealer overall: shade match 55%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, skin suitability 5%.

The match
bareMinerals
Medium Tan 3.5W
Depth and undertone: Medium light · Warm · golden
Finish and coverage: Luminous · Buildable coverage
Overall match
72out of 100
Shade (Shade match)
73
Finish (Finish & visual result)
79
Wear (Wear & performance)
65
Skin (Skin suitability)
50
Best price
$31Ulta BeautyUlta Beauty
$5 less (14%)

Your shade $36 at Sephora

Looking for a foundation in your shade?

The closest shade to NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer Walnut (Medium light · Olive undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.

From the same range

  1. NARS Natural Radiant Longwear Foundation

    Vanuatu - Medium 3.5

    NARS Natural Radiant Longwear Foundation, shade Vanuatu - Medium 3.5

    • Close colour
    • Medium light · Olive undertone

    $55

Closest foundations

  1. NARS Natural Matte Longwear Foundation

    PHOENIX

    NARS Natural Matte Longwear Foundation, shade PHOENIX

    • Very close colour
    • Medium light · Olive undertone

    $55

  2. Polite Society More Than a Pretty Face Skin-Caring Foundation

    Medium Tan Warm

    Polite Society More Than a Pretty Face Skin-Caring Foundation, shade Medium Tan Warm

    • Very close colour
    • Medium light · Olive undertone

    $42

  3. Rare Beauty True to Myself Natural Matte Longwear Foundation

    24 Medium Warm

    Rare Beauty True to Myself Natural Matte Longwear Foundation, shade 24 Medium Warm

    • Very close colour
    • Light medium · Olive · warm olive undertone

    $38

  4. Laura Geller Double Take Baked Full Coverage Foundation

    Golden Medium

    Laura Geller Double Take Baked Full Coverage Foundation, shade Golden Medium

    • Very close colour
    • Light medium · Olive undertone

    $38

  5. about-face THE PERFORMER Skin-Focused Foundation

    M3WARM

    about-face THE PERFORMER Skin-Focused Foundation, shade M3WARM

    • Looks identical
    • Medium light · Warm · yellow undertone

    $17.50

  6. NARS Light Reflecting Foundation

    Phoenix

    NARS Light Reflecting Foundation, shade Phoenix

    • Close colour
    • Medium light · Olive undertone

    $55

Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.

Why the closest shade match works

Milk Makeup Future Fluid Longwear Hydrating Concealer in 12O, against NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer in Walnut. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.

ComparedYour shadeWalnutClosest shade match12OScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour66#e9a060#d09c63Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.5 (0 is identical)
Depth87Medium lightMediumCloseDepth difference: 5.3
Retailer descriptionMedium tanMediumSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Undertone100OliveOliveSamefrom retailer shade descriptions
Finish & visual result25% of overall64
Finish56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage100MediumBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared65
Longevity7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stabilitynot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type50Normal, dry, combinationNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 71/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match

Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.

How scoring works

If you switch

To Milk Makeup Future Fluid Longwear Hydrating Concealer in 12O.

Same or better

  • $6 less
  • Same olive undertone
  • Buildable rather than medium coverage
  • Claims a skin-like finish
  • Both claim not settling into lines
  • Claims a lightweight feel

Different

  • Small colour difference on the swatch
  • Runs slightly deeper
  • Natural finish instead of radiant
  • No blurring effect claimed
  • Does not claim transfer resistance

Ingredients (information only, not scored)

8 shared ingredients; weighted similarity 17%. Ingredients only affect results through the filters.

AttributeYour shadeClosest shade match
BaseWater-based, high siliconeWater-based, no silicone
FragranceNot listedNot listed
Drying alcoholNot listedNot listed
SPFNot listedNot listed
OverlapBoth water-based; silicone high vs none

Why the closest overall alternative works

bareMinerals ORIGINAL Liquid Mineral Brightening Concealer in Medium Tan 3.5W, against NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer in Walnut. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.

ComparedYour shadeWalnutClosest overall alternativeMedium Tan 3.5WScore
Shade match55% of overall73
Colour71#e9a060#dca872Close colourColour difference 4.9 (0 is identical)
Depth98Medium lightMedium lightSameDepth difference: 1.0
Retailer descriptionMedium tanMedium tanBoth described as medium tanThe retailers describe the same depth
Undertone65OliveWarm · goldenSome differencefrom retailer shade descriptions
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared79
Finish78RadiantLuminousCloseLuminous finish rather than radiant
Coverage100MediumBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finishnot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared65
Longevity7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stabilitynot comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type50Normal, dry, combinationNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 72/100Shade match 73/100Medium confidence· Digital match

Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.

How scoring works

If you switch

To bareMinerals ORIGINAL Liquid Mineral Brightening Concealer in Medium Tan 3.5W.

Same or better

  • $5 less
  • Luminous finish instead of radiant
  • Buildable rather than medium coverage
  • Both claim not settling into lines
  • Claims a lightweight feel

Different

  • Small colour difference on the swatch
  • Slightly warmer undertone
  • No blurring effect claimed
  • Does not claim transfer resistance

Ingredients (information only, not scored)

7 shared ingredients; weighted similarity 15%. Ingredients only affect results through the filters.

AttributeYour shadeClosest overall alternative
BaseWater-based, high siliconeno silicone
FragranceNot listedNot listed
Drying alcoholNot listedNot listed
SPFNot listedNot listed
OverlapWater-based vs unknown-based; silicone high vs none

Where to buy

Closest shade match

Milk Makeup Future Fluid Longwear Hydrating Concealer 12O

Match price
$30Ulta BeautyUlta Beauty
$6 less (17%)

Your shade $36 at Sephora · product price; shade not separately priced

Closest overall alternative

bareMinerals ORIGINAL Liquid Mineral Brightening Concealer Medium Tan 3.5W

Best price
$31Ulta BeautyUlta Beauty
$5 less (14%)

Your shade $36 at Sephora

How these matches are scored

30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.

Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.