Radiant Creamy Concealer Walnut dupes and alternatives NARS
4.5 (22,453)·Medium light · Olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium-full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium-full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium with yellow/neutral undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (78%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Satin rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same olive undertone· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium-full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium-full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan with neutral olive undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Luminous rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Luminous rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: for medium-tan warm skin with golden undertones
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (64%)4.2 (11,365)
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
57
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
87
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: tan skin tones with golden undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium tan with warm peach undertones
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium-full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan with neutral/golden undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
83
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for combination skin
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium-full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral peach undertones
The closest shade to NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer Walnut (Medium light · Olive undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
MAC Cosmetics Studio Fix 36HR Smooth Angles Hydrating Concealer in NC40, against NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer in Walnut. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWalnutClosest shade matchNC40How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%91#e9a060#e19e67Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Overall match 74/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Topaz 7, against NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer in Walnut. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWalnutClosest overall alternativeTopaz 7How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%88#e9a060#e39b64Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Overall match 79/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$14 less (39%)
