Radiant Creamy Concealer Café Con Leche dupes and alternatives NARS
4.5 (22,453)·Very fair · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (78%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Satin rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: light with golden beige undertones
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (64%)4.2 (11,365)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
57
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
87
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: light skin tones with golden undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Olive rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
90
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Olive rather than warm undertone · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral olive undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Olive rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
90
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Olive rather than warm undertone · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: light medium with warm olive undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Olive rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
90
Visibly different colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Olive rather than warm undertone · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: light with warm olive undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
90
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for light skin w/ warm undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Matte rather than radiant finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal skin
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for light to medium skin with golden undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
33
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with warm peach undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
$31Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (14%)4.3 (1,273)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Luminous rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Luminous rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: for light warm skin with yellow undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (64%)4.2 (11,365)
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same radiant finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
57
Skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly cooler undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for light skin with neutral golden undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
87
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: light skin tones with neutral undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
90
Visibly different colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for light to medium skin w/ warm yellow undertones
The closest shade to NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer Café Con Leche (Very fair · Warm undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Glossier Stretch Concealer for Dewy Buildable Coverage in Light 3, against NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer in Café Con Leche. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCafé Con LecheClosest matchLight 3How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%96#fad290#fed697Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared89
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%100MediumBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared65
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Normal, dry, combinationNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.